Legal Opinion
Fennell v. Butler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1978No. Nos. 77-1782 and 77-1822PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
These two appeals arise from separate orders of the district court, the Honorable Donald D. Alsop presiding, denying the plaintiffs’ motions for preliminary injunction. The Fennell appeal, No. 77-1782, relates to an attempt by the plaintiff to re*264strain the City of St. Paul from enforcing an amended ordinance relating to licensing provisions and restrictions on the hours of operation of saunas and massage parlors, and to compel the issuance of a license to practice massage by the Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners.
In the Smith appeal, No. 77-1822, the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Gresham v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
3Cited by58 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- PLANNED PARENT. MN, N. DAKOTA, S. DAKOTA v. RoundsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Monahan v. State of Neb.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
- Marvin Frejlach, D/B/A the Payne Reliever v. Rosalie Butler, Individually and in Her Capacity as Councilperson of the City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.