Legal Opinion
Antonios A. Alevizopoulos & Associates, Inc. v. Comcast International Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 2000No. 99 Civ. 9311(SAS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are suing Comcast International Holdings, Inc. and Comcast Corporation (collectively “Comcast”) alleging tor-tious interference with contract, tortious interference with business relations, and conspiracy to breach fiduciary duty. Com-cast now moves pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs’ tort claims against Comcast are time-barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations. Alternatively, Comcast moves under Rule 12(b)(6) for dismissal of plaintiffs’ tort…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- RSM PRODUCTION CORP. v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Silverman v. H.I.L. Associates Ltd. (In Re Allou Distributors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Gym Door Repairs, Inc. v. Young Equip. Sales, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- American Building Maintenance Co. v. Acme Property Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2007
- Lewis v. RosenfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.