Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Dissent
I cannot agree with the prevailing opinion in this case for the reason that I believe the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable.
The tire and rim assembly which caused the injury was exclusively under the control of the defendant. It had been last assembled by parties other than plaintiff. After the accident, the defendant again took possession.
As far as the record shows, defendant, after the injury, caused no examination of the equipment to be made by persons experienced in handling such equipment. If such an examination were made, the finding must have been unfavorable to defendant as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grotenrath v. GrotenrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Clarke v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Cullen v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Sullivan v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907