Crowell v. Thoreau Center, Partnership
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SIMMS, Justice:
We grant certiorari for the limited purpose of discussing the issues of waiver and estoppel raised by appellees in their briefs on appeal but not addressed by the Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, in their published opinion at 51 OBJ 129. The Court of Appeals opinion is in all other respects approved.
Appellees claim that the Crowells have waived or are estopped to assert the alleged fraud in the procurement of the listing and sales contracts by their failure to assert it for approximately six months. Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Slyman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Oxley v. General Atlantic Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Barringer v. Baptist Healthcare of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- J.I. Case Credit Corporation v. Bobby Crites, and Rodney TimmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.