Legal Opinion

Crowell v. Thoreau Center, Partnership

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1981No. 51272PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMMS, Justice:

We grant certiorari for the limited purpose of discussing the issues of waiver and estoppel raised by appellees in their briefs on appeal but not addressed by the Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, in their published opinion at 51 OBJ 129. The Court of Appeals opinion is in all other respects approved.

Appellees claim that the Crowells have waived or are estopped to assert the alleged fraud in the procurement of the listing and sales contracts by their failure to assert it for approximately six months. Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fipps v. StidhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Slyman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Seymour v. SwartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Oxley v. General Atlantic Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Barringer v. Baptist Healthcare of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
  5. J.I. Case Credit Corporation v. Bobby Crites, and Rodney TimmCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API