Legal Opinion
Lubin v. Wackenhut Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 2016No. B244383PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Appellants Nivida Lubin, Sylvia M. Maresca, and Kevin Denton (together plaintiffs) filed this action on behalf of themselves and similarly situated persons, alleging defendant and respondent The Wackenhut Corporation (Wackenhut) 1 violated California labor laws by failing to provide employees with off-duty meal and rest breaks and by providing inadequate wage statements. The trial court initially granted plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. However, as the case approached trial, the United States Supreme Court reversed a grant of class certification in Wal-Mart…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Donohue v. AMN Services, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Ming-Hsiang Kao v. Joy Holiday, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In re ABM Indus. Overtime Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Lampe v. Queen of the Valley Med. Ctr., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Donohue v. Amn Servs., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.