Legal Opinion
Lampe v. Queen of the Valley Med. Ctr.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided January 2, 2018No. A146588PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRuvolo, P.J.
*836I.
INTRODUCTION
Appellants Michael Lampe and Karen McNair appeal the trial court's order denying class certification of their wage and hour claims against Queen of the Valley Medical Center (QVMC). The trial court concluded that individualized issues predominated and the claims could not be proven efficiently as a class. We conclude substantial evidence supports the trial court's findings and it did not abuse its discretion in denying class certification. We affirm.
II
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
QVMC is a full-service hospital with 94 departments. Appellants Lampe and McNair are nurses…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Cirrincione v. American Scissor LiftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- David v. Queen of the Valley Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Dylan Stewart v. San Luis Ambulance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.