Moore v. Coit
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
This case stems-from a traffic mishap. The plaintiffs, Coit et al, alleged, inter alia, that the defendants, Lowell Moore and Eugene W. Moore (partners in Moore Motor Co.), entrusted their automobile, for purpose of operation, to certain named bailees; that the defendants “.... were then and there fully aware of the intoxicated state and condition of such bailees; and that said bailees, while so intoxicated, negligently and wrongfully drove the Moore automobile into a car occupied by the plaintiffs, resulting in the plaintiffs’ injuries and damages. Trial to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chaney v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Sanders v. WaldenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- McAllister, Administrator v. CalhounSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- White v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Murrell v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.