Legal Opinion

Faulk v. Aware, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJacob Markowitz, J.

This is a motion to strike out various complete and partial defenses as insufficient in law, and for certain alternative relief, pursuant to rules 103 and 109 of the Eules of Civil Practice. Although the defenses and partial defenses do not state that they are addressed only to the first cause of action, the brief submitted by plaintiff treats them as relating only to that cause of action and the brief of the defendants acquiesces in this veiw. The defenses and partial defenses purport to allege justification, fair comment, privilege, reply, and corresponding partial defenses which are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Fleckenstein v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Faulk v. Aware, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Guenther v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barry M. Goldwater v. Ralph Ginzburg, Warren Boroson, and Factmagazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API