Faulk v. Aware, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
Plaintiff moves (1) to dismiss the second and fourth defenses as insufficient in law, (2) to dismiss the third defense as insufficient, or, in the alternative, to require defendants to make the same more definite and certain, and (3) to vacate a notice to take plaintiff’s testimony before trial. Defendants claim that the complaint is insufficient and that *835plaintiff’s motion must, therefore, be denied under the rule that a motion to dismiss defenses searches the record and must be denied if the complaint fails to state a good cause of action (Teller v. Prospect Heights Hosp., 280 N. Y. 456,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Bingham v. . GaynorNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cahill v. Hawaiian Paradise Park CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Faulk v. Aware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Corman v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Appalachian Power Co. v. American Institute of Certified Public AccountantsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Firester v. LipsonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.