Legal Opinion

Fleckenstein v. Friedman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1934PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The plaintiff Fleckenstein and the defendant Friedman were sometime college and later professional football players. In 1932 Friedman wrote and the defendant Collier Company published an article dealing with the amenities of the game. It stated, among other things, that “ Both games [college and professional] suffer from the occasional player with a mean streak — the bully of boyhood who knows his physical superiority and takes sadistic pleasure in displaying it.” This theme was first illustrated by reference to the conduct of an anonymous college player and then by reference to Fleckenstein…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Bush v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Cafferty v. . Southern Tier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Gressman v. . Morning Journal Assn.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Lanpher v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Memphis Publishing Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Phyllis Meloff v. New York Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Biro v. Condé NastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API