Durham v. United States Parole Commission
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant James R. Durham (“Durham”) appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas’ corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The crux of Durham’s claim is that the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) erred in calculating the amount of time remaining on his 1983 bank-robbery conviction in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. We disagree, and we therefore AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The tale of Durham’s criminal history and his involvement in the federal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Toufic Nagi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Conklin Wallace v. Robert ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jose Matamoros v. Greg GramsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Bailey v. BattsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Barnett v. BowersDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Bigbee v. JansonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Burke v. HallDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.