Legal Opinion
Toufic Nagi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 24, 1996No. 95-1571PublishedCited by 177 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiler, J.
NELSON, J. (pp. 136-37), delivered a separate concurring opinion. KEITH, J. (pp. 137-38), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Toufic Nagi appeals the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion to vacate or correct his sentence. Nagi claims his sentence violated the Constitution because the wrong version of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“the Guidelines”) was used to calculate his base offense level. The government asserts that Nagi has waived any objection to his sentence and that he has failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel to excuse…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- Eddie D. Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Brian K. Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Kevin Antonio Goode v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Karl A. Schledwitz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Kevin Wright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.