Legal Opinion

O'NEILL v. Runyon

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 27, 1995No. 93-B-2131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

In this Title VII employment discrimination action, defendant, Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, (Postmaster) moves for partial summary judgment on plaintiff Terrance P. O’Neill’s (O’Neill) claim for front pay or reinstatement under the doctrine of after-acquired evidence of misconduct. The Postmaster also moves for partial summary judgment on Runyon’s claim for compensatory damages and jury trial request based on the effective date of the Civil Rights Act of 1991. After consideration of the motion, briefs, and oral argument, I grant the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. WangenDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
  2. Carr v. Woodbury County Juvenile Detention CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API