Liu v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Thomas
The Court correctly declines to affirm the Ninth Circuit's decision upholding the District Court's disgorgement order, but I disagree with the Court's decision to vacate and remand for the lower courts to "limi[t]" the disgorgement award. Ante, at 1940 -1941. Disgorgement can never be awarded under 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5). That statute authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to seek only "equitable relief that may be appropriate or necessary for the benefit of investors," and disgorgement is not a traditional equitable remedy. Thus, I would reverse the judgment of the Court of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.