Legal Opinion

Hawley v. Reclamation Dist. No. 730

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1934No. Docket Nos. Sac. 4737, 4738, 4739, 1470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Reclamation District No. 730, one of the defendants in these consolidated cases, was organized in 1902 under the provisions of the Political Code applicable to the formation of reclamation districts. In 1907, an assessment (the first) was levied under a plan which called for the “raising” of a levee along the Sacramento River which apparently was in existence when the district was formed. In 1909, a new (second) assessment was spread under plans for securing additional rights of way for the district’s levee system, to further raise the river levee, and to provide for a district drainage…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hershey v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Proceeding to Validate Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment Number SixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Reclamation District No. 108 v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Reclamation District No. 537 of Yolo County v. BurgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Athearn v. NicolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philippart v. Hotchkiss Tract Reclamation District 799California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Honegger v. Reclamation District Number 1619California Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Knights Landing Ridge Drainage District v. Reclamation District No. 730California Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API