Legal Opinion
Honegger v. Reclamation District Number 1619
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1961No. Civ. No. 19169PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COAKLEY, J. pro tem.*
This ease involves questions of operation and maintenance assessments on property lying *687within Reclamation District Number 1619, which, in turn, is located in Contra Costa County. The appeal is by the interveners from a judgment of the superior court of that county.
Unless otherwise indicated all code section references are to the Water Code. And unless otherwise indicated the plaintiff and respondent landowners will be referred to as respondents, the defendant and respondent Reclamation District Number 1619, as the District, and the intervener and appellant property…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Shasta Dam Area Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lieberman v. KCOP Television, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Harrison v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Smith v. WORKMEN'S COMP. APP. BD. HAROLD EUGENE SNOOKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966