Legal Opinion

Stickle v. Guardian Trust Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1938No. 26643PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

This is an action instituted under favor of Section 710-92, General Code, whereby the plaintiff seeks to establish a preference in the sum of $543,432.13, being the balance due to plaintiff from defendant, the Superintendent of Banks, as liquidator of The Guardian Trust Company of Cleveland.

The question for decision is whether the second amended petition of the plaintiff states a cause of action. A demurrer thereto was sustained by the Court of Common Pleas and that judgment was reversed by the Court of Appeals. A motion by defendant to certify the record to this court for review was allowed.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bank of the Republic v. MillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Steele v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. McLain v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Sheridan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  5. Bank of Blackwell v. DeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BinderOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API