Sheridan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon; Frank H. Rudkin, Judge. Thomas R. Sheridan was convicted of violating Rev. St. § 5209 (Comp. St. 1913, § 9772), by abstracting and converting to his own use money and funds of a national banking association, with intent to defraud, and he brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted on two counts of an indictment which charged him with the violation of section 5209, Revised Statutes (section 9772, Comp. St. 1913), by abstracting and converting to his own use the moneys and funds of a national banking association, with intent to defraud the association and the depositor of the money.
[ 1 ] It is contended that the demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained on the ground that the plaintiff in error is therein charged with the unlawful abstraction and conversion of a special deposit. The contention that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cochran & Sayre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Winston C. Graham A/K/A Vincent Graham, A/K/A Michael Diamond A/K/A Tyrone L. Simmons, Winston C. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Alejandro Robles-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.