Consolidated Gray-Fordtown-Colonial Heights Utility District of Washington v. O'Neill
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
This action was brought in the County Court of Sulli-can County, Tennessee, by the appellees who were residents of certain districts of Sullivan County, together with Commissioners of the South Kingsport Utility District against seven named defendants, who were the President and members of the appellant Consolidated Gray-Fordtown-Colonial Heights Utility District. The *344purpose of the petition was to have certain portions of the boundaries of the Consolidated Gray-Fordtown Utility District taken from it and added to the boundaries of the South Kingsport Utility District.
It is likewise alleged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Morton v. Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Chandler Investment Co. v. Whitehaven Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Willett v. Corporation of BellvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by3 opinions
- Whitehaven Utility District of Shelby County v. RamsayTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Town of Rogersville Ex Rel. Rogersville Water Commission v. Mid Hawkins County Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
- West Wilson Utility District v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1969