Legal Opinion

Chandler Investment Co. v. Whitehaven Utility District

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 1, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarnet, J.

The Whitehaven Utility District appeals from a decree of the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, authorizing the complainant, below, Chandler Investment Company, to contract with the Light, Gas and Water Division of the City of Memphis for service of water to its subdivision known as Adanac Gardens located within the geographical limits of the Whitehaven Utility District. The Utility District insists upon this appeal that by statute it is given the exclusive franchise to furnish water within its area, and therefore, neither the Light, Gas and Water Division of the City of Memphis nor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BeelerTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Cline v. Red Bank Utility Dist.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Horton v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. STATE BY FURMAN v. Elizabethtown Water Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  2. Whitehaven Utility District of Shelby County v. RamsayTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Crossville v. Middle Tennessee Utility DistrictTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Consolidated Gray-Fordtown-Colonial Heights Utility District of Washington v. O'NeillTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Town of Rogersville Ex Rel. Rogersville Water Commission v. Mid Hawkins County Utility DistrictCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API