Legal Opinion

Manie v. Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1966No. Docket 1,057PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, P. J.

The ■unusual train of events which brings about this case and the attendant appeal produces questions for decision by this Court which are no less fascinating than the facts themselves. Broadly stated, the issue before us is whether the plaintiff properly stated a cause of action based on the misadventures which befell her in December, 1963, all stemming from the purchase of a car. . -

A brief resume produces this intriguing fact 'Situation: On December 6, 1963, Ernest Manie, the husband of the plaintiff, entered into an agreement with the Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Company in Muskegon to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Shaw v. WiegartzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Manie v. Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rauhe v. Langeland Memorial ChapelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API