Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Wiegartz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1965No. Docket 214PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

No single human act has been so tortured by the law as the simple deed of going onto the property of another and being injured. Courts, in their efforts to refrain from imposing undue burdens on injured parties or landowners, have set up categories and categories-within-categories to designate the “status” of the injured and the “knowledge” of the landowner.

The tangled skein created by the law can only be unravelled by close inspection and this saga is no exception to this precept.

Plaintiff Eve M. Shaw is an aunt of defendant Dorothy Wiegartz. The husbands of each party, though named in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Samuelson v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Miller v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Kevreson v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Mallory v. PitcairnMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Van Pelt v. PaullMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Genesee Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Cox v. HayesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Dobbek v. Herman Gundlach, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Stadelmann v. Glen Falls InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API