Legal Opinion

Manie v. Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1967No. Calendar 16, Docket 51,424PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Harí, J.

This is an appeal on leave granted from a decision of the Court of Appeals (2 Mich App 315), which modified a judgment for plaintiff-appellant entered in the circuit court. The facts and issues are accurately stated by the Court of Appeals. We quote:

“On December 6, 1963, Ernest Manie, the husband of the plaintiff, entered into an agreement with the Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Company in Muskegon to purchase a 1960 Cadillac automobile with a 1961 Comet to be traded in on it. The 1961 Comet had a trailer hitch attached, which was to be removed by the Grand Rapids firm which originally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. . Rochester Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Nelson v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Alexander v. PacholekMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Manie v. Matson Oldsmobile-Cadillac Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. TOMS v. McCONNELMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Reed v. PontonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Daley v. LaCroixMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API