Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Title Ins. & Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1918No. L. A. No. 5797PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas. Writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This is an application for a writ of supersedeas.

The action was one for damages, and plaintiff obtained judgment in the court below. The judgment, so far as material, was as follows, viz.: “That said plaintiff Prank Whitaker have and recover from said Title Insurance and Trust Company, a corporation, the sum of $6,391 with interest thereon from the twentieth day of September, 1912, and $375.75 with interest thereon from October 4, 1913, together with his costs and disbursements incurred in this action, amounting to the sum of 72 and 75-100 dqllars.” The judgment was thus “one directing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Begbie v. BegbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Shain v. City of AlbanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Chamberlin v. Dale's R v. Rentals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API