Chamberlin v. Dale's R v. Rentals, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Defendants Dale’s R.V. Rentals, Inc. and Dale Lissner (Dale’s) appeal an order determining the amount of the appeal undertaking posted by Dale’s to be insufficient and requiring Dale’s to increase the undertaking amount to cover attorney fees awarded plaintiff Harold Chamberlin. We affirm the order.
I
In June 1982 the parties executed a recreational vehicle consignment agreement for Dale’s to rent Chamberlin’s recreational vehicle to Dale’s customers. The parties’ agreement provided: “If any action at law or in equity is necessary to enforce or interpret the terms of this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Whitaker v. Title Ins. & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of San Pedro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Elsea v. SaberiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- CHAPALA MANAGEMENT CORP. v. StantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- California Recreation Industries v. KiersteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Banks v. ManosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.