Newland v. Cnty. of L. A.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtKriegler, Acting P.J.
*377*678An employee driving home from work on a day that he did not have any job duties outside of the office injured a third party. After a jury trial, the trial court imposed liability on the employer based on evidence that the employee regularly used his personal vehicle for work on other days. The employer contends there was no substantial evidence to support finding that the employee was driving in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident, because he was not required to use a personal vehicle that day.
We agree that an employee must be driving a personal vehicle in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Farmers Insurance Group v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tammen and Jurgens v. TronvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Bingener v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Feltham v. Universal Protection Service, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Marez v. Lyft, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Mario Piril v. Ferguson Enterprises, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.