Legal Opinion

CENTRAL NAT. INS. GROUP OF OMAHA v. Grimmett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 10, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The primary issue in this case is whether the acceptance of late premium payments by Wright's Insurance Agency with knowledge that, during the period of default, William J. Grimmett had been involved in an accident estops the Central National Insurance Group from denying coverage. We hold that it does and affirm the trial Court.

Grimmett purchased an insurance contract from Central through its agent, Wright. The policy expired on September 10, 1974. Prior to this expiration, in either July or August, Grimmett received written notification by mail that his policy would lapse on September 10.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. EhrhardtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Ramirez v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Anderson v. Cooperative Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  4. American Cas. Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. DeTemple v. Southern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API