Legal Opinion

United States v. Perron

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 1, 2001No. CGCMS 24172; Docket No. 1115PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

On 28 August 2000, this Court set aside the convening authority’s action in this case and returned the record for corrective steps due to a failure of a material term of Appellant’s pretrial agreement. United States v. Perron, 53 M.J. 774 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App.2000). That term mandated disapproval of all adjudged forfeitures, and also required the convening authority to “pay the dependents of the accused,” id. at 775, by waiving any forfeitures caused by Article 58, UCMJ, 10 USC § 858. Appellant was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, and reduction to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  3. United States v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. PerronU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  4. United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API