United States v. Perron
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Chief Judge:
On 28 August 2000, this Court set aside the convening authority’s action in this case and returned the record for corrective steps due to a failure of a material term of Appellant’s pretrial agreement. United States v. Perron, 53 M.J. 774 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App.2000). That term mandated disapproval of all adjudged forfeitures, and also required the convening authority to “pay the dependents of the accused,” id. at 775, by waiving any forfeitures caused by Article 58, UCMJ, 10 USC § 858. Appellant was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days, and reduction to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. OlsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. HardcastleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. PerronU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. PerronCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003