Gravett v. Marks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The chancellor held that Sheriff Carroll Gravett had no authority to cure a constitutionally deficient post-judgment execution statute by requiring notice to garnishees not required by the statute. The chancellor was correct. The decision is affirmed.
The Sheriff designed a notice form to supply the constitutional deficiency in Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-66-211 and 16-66-401 (1987). The form was used in conjunction with service of judgment execution documents upon appellee Meyer Marks. The chancellor held the service on Marks was invalid due to the invalidity of the statute on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Huffman v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Duhon v. GravettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Morgan v. Cook, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Davis v. PaschallDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bob Hankins Distributing Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991