Legal Opinion
Bob Hankins Distributing Co. v. May
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided March 18, 1991No. 90-227PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellant, Bob Hankins Distributing Company, brings this appeal to challenge a ruling of the Greene County Chancery Court that upheld the constitutionality of the Arkansas Garnishment Statutes, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-110-401 to -415 (1987).1 We reverse and dismiss.
Appellee, Willie Frances May, obtained two judgments against her former husband, Billy May, on sums that accrued pursuant to rights given her in a decree of divorce. Billy May was an employee of appellant. Two default judgments were obtained against appellant when it failed to respond to two writs of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Huffman v. DawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- May v. Bob Hankins Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Morgan v. Cook, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. D.A.N. Joint Venture III, L.P.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Land O'Frost, Inc. v. PledgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Seyller v. Pierce & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997