People v. Mitchell
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko
The defendant was convicted of armed robbery in a jury trial and was sentenced to a term of not less than eight, nor more than twenty years. On appeal, the defendant contends that the identification evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that from the evidence in this case and the failure to conduct any pretrial identification procedure, the manner of identification was conducive to mistake; that defendant was denied adequate representation of counsel; and was denied time to prepare his case because of the trial court’s refusal to grant a requested continuance.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- The People v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- The People v. BoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- The PEOPLE v. BrinkleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barraia v. DonoghueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- People v. LawlessAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978