Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 1970No. Gen. No. 53,588PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adesko

The defendant was convicted of armed robbery in a jury trial and was sentenced to a term of not less than eight, nor more than twenty years. On appeal, the defendant contends that the identification evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; that from the evidence in this case and the failure to conduct any pretrial identification procedure, the manner of identification was conducive to mistake; that defendant was denied adequate representation of counsel; and was denied time to prepare his case because of the trial court’s refusal to grant a requested continuance.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. The People v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. The People v. BoneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. The PEOPLE v. BrinkleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barraia v. DonoghueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. People v. HolmesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. People v. LawlessAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API