Legal Opinion

Barraia v. Donoghue

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 12, 1977No. 63037PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn

Defendant, Jay Daly, appeals from the trial court’s decision allowing plaintiff, Jerome J. Barraia to regain possession of a yacht formerly owned by plaintiff and sold to Daly through defendant William A. Donoghue. The case was decided by the trial court after the parties entered into a stipulation of facts. Daly contends the trial court erred in concluding that there was no valid contract of sale binding on Barraia.

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

The facts disclose that Barraia was the owner of a 55-foot yacht known as the Morning Mist. On April 20, 1974, defendant, Donoghue, informed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John Kubinski & Sons, Inc. v. Dockside Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Wing v. LedererAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Lawcock v. United States Trotting Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Richton v. FarinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Hofner v. Glenn Ingram & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Wasleff v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Delasky v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Real Estate Data, Inc. v. The Sidwell Co., and Sidwell Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API