Barraia v. Donoghue
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Linn
Defendant, Jay Daly, appeals from the trial court’s decision allowing plaintiff, Jerome J. Barraia to regain possession of a yacht formerly owned by plaintiff and sold to Daly through defendant William A. Donoghue. The case was decided by the trial court after the parties entered into a stipulation of facts. Daly contends the trial court erred in concluding that there was no valid contract of sale binding on Barraia.
We reverse and remand for a new trial.
The facts disclose that Barraia was the owner of a 55-foot yacht known as the Morning Mist. On April 20, 1974, defendant, Donoghue, informed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John Kubinski & Sons, Inc. v. Dockside Development Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Wing v. LedererAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Lawcock v. United States Trotting Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Richton v. FarinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schoenberger v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Hofner v. Glenn Ingram & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Wasleff v. DeverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- Delasky v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Real Estate Data, Inc. v. The Sidwell Co., and Sidwell Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.