Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Brinkley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1965No. 38389PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Solfisburg

James T. Brinkley and John Bell were jointly tried by a jury in the criminal court of Cook County and found guilty of having committed an armed robbery at a tailor shop operated by Benjamin Biegel in the city of Chicago. Brinkley, to whom we shall refer as defendant, seeks review contending : (1) that he was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) that the trial court erred in exempting a police officer from an order excluding witnesses from the court room; and (3) that he was deprived of due process of law because his conviction was based in part upon admissions obtained from Bell…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. The People v. HartgravesIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. The People v. GolsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. The People v. TunstallIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. StringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. The PEOPLE v. CatlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. MatlackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  4. The People v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. The PEOPLE v. MooreIllinois Supreme Court · 1969

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API