State v. Naple
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶ 1] The district court dismissed with prejudice a controlled substances charge against Laura Jeanne Naple as a sanction for the State’s failure to comply with its discovery obligations. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of review and conclude the district court had the authority, under W.R.Cr.P. 16(d)(2), to dismiss the criminal charge with prejudice to sanction the State for violating a discovery obligation. That authority must, however, be used cautiously and only after consideration of the proper factors, including the reasons for the discovery violation, the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Black v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Travis J. Kovach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Willoughby v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.