Legal Opinion

State v. Naple

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. 05-113PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] The district court dismissed with prejudice a controlled substances charge against Laura Jeanne Naple as a sanction for the State’s failure to comply with its discovery obligations. We granted the State’s petition for a writ of review and conclude the district court had the authority, under W.R.Cr.P. 16(d)(2), to dismiss the criminal charge with prejudice to sanction the State for violating a discovery obligation. That authority must, however, be used cautiously and only after consideration of the proper factors, including the reasons for the discovery violation, the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Gregory M. Toth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Black v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Travis J. Kovach v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Willoughby v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API