Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 8, 1986No. 84C170, 85C9385PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBERG, District Judge.
These consolidated actions seek to recover withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. Plaintiff Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“Central States”) is a multiemployer plan as defined in 29 U.S.C. § 1002(37)(A). The plan’s trustees are also plaintiffs. Defendants Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. (“Pepsi-Cola”), Pepsico, Inc. (“Pepsico”), Frito-Lay, Inc.…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Dr. Ben Branch, Trustee of Bank of New England Corporation, Derivatively and on Behalf and in the Name of Maine National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Fryman v. Century Factors (In Re Art Shirt Ltd.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Loran W. Robbins, Cross-Appellants v. McNicholas Transportation Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.