Williamson v. Guentzel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Stan Williamson challenges the trial court’s summary judgment that dismisses his malicious prosecution action. The court held that appellant was collaterally es-topped from relitigating the issue of whether respondent Scott Fetzer Company had a reasonable basis for filing an earlier suit against him in federal district court. Because the federal trial court made specific findings that the original suit was neither groundless nor unreasonable, we affirm the summary judgment.
FACTS
In 1993 respondent Fetzer, which manufacturers vacuum cleaners through its Kirby…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Hartman v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Brown v. State Automobile & Casualty UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Haavisto v. PerpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Popp Telcom, Formerly Known as Ldb International Corporation, Inc., Humbird Securities, Company Northern Securities, Company, Washington Sharecom, Inc. v. American Sharecom, Inc. Steven C. Simon James J. Weinert William J. King, Popp Telcom, Formerly Known as Ldb International Corporation, Inc., Humbird Securities, Company Northern Securities, Company, Washington Sharecom, Inc. v. American Sharecom, Inc. Steven C. Simon James J. Weinert William J. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Valles v. SilvermanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Palisoc v. PobleteSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Capistrant v. Lifetouch National School Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Humbird Securities v. American SharecomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.