Legal Opinion
Gerard Rosano v. Township of Teaneck
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 10, 2014No. 13-1263PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from an action brought by eighty-eight current and former police officers (“Appellants”) employed by the Township of Teaneck (“Teaneck”) in Tean-eck, New Jersey. Appellants contended that Teaneck violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to: (1) pay proper overtime; (2) provide compensation for time spent attending daily roll calls (“muster time”); and (3) provide compensation for time spent putting on (“donning”) and taking off (“doffing”) uniforms and equipment each day. The District Court granted…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Danny Flores v. City of San GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Bobbi-Jo Smiley v. EI DuPont de Nemours & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Nardello v. Balboa (In re Nardello)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Danny Flores v. City of San GabrielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Perez v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.