American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
The only contested point in this suit for refund of income and excess profits taxes is the timeliness of plaintiff’s refund claim. The defendant does not deny that the taxes were overpaid, but it contends that recovery is now barred because the formal claim for refund came some months too late. We reject the defense and hold that plaintiff made a seasonable demand.
For the span of years beginning with 1941, plaintiff duly elected to use the “last in, first out” (“Lifo”) method of inventorying goods under Section 22(d) (“method of inventorying…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Newton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Rosengarten v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Night Hawk Leasing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Minehan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Mike Gustin v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Computervision Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Charles D. REICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DOW BADISCHE COMPANY and Dow Chemical Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.