Legal Opinion

Rosengarten v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 2, 1960No. 307-56, 308-56PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

These actions for the recovery of income taxes for the year 1945, $34,837.90 plus interest as to plaintiff Herbert Ros-engarten, and $16,164.38 plus interest as to plaintiff David Rosengarten, have been consolidated by stipulation because of the similarity of the questions presented.

During the years 1944 and 1945 plaintiffs were members of a family partnership, the Herbert Manufacturing Co. of New York City. Each filed a Federal income tax return for 1945 on March 13, 1946, and subsequently paid the liabilities due thereon. In 1947, the Internal Revenue Service determined…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. Garbutt Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Crude Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  5. Harry Jones v. United States of America, Carrie A. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Charlson Realty Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Disabled American Veterans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Szczesny v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API