Legal Opinion

People v. Goodwin

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1901No. Crim. No. 705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from an order denying a new trial. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY,C.

—The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of the crime of seduction under promise of marriage and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

1. In a case of this kind, it is worse than useless for counsel to address long arguments to this court on mere questions of fact. The prosecutrix testified to every fact necessary to establish defendant’s guilt as charged. The jurors were the sole judges of her credibility. They believed her, and found, the defendant guilty. Therefore he must be treated as guilty, and suffer the penalty of his crime, unless it is shown that for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. People v. RangodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Robinson v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State v. WickliffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bridge v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. RicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. TibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API