Legal Opinion
Britt v. City of Pomona
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1990No. B041918PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of dismissal which was entered after the trial court sustained demurrers, without leave to amend, to all 10 causes of action in their first amended complaint. By their action, plaintiffs seek to invalidate as unconstitutional a municipal tax imposed upon persons living in hotels and like lodgings. Plaintiffs filed this action after the defendant municipality amended a taxing scheme that had previously taxed the use of such transient living quarters for periods of 30 days or less. The amended ordinance at issue here is designed to tax the use…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. BarksdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of San Bernardino Hotel/Motel Ass'n v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Barclays Bank International Limited v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Garcia v. Four Points Sheraton LAXCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Santa Cruz v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.