Legal Opinion

Estate of Schwarz ex rel. Schwarz v. Philip Morris Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2010No. CC 000201376; CA A118589; SC S053644PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment1 prohibits a jury from imposing punitive damages to punish a defendant directly for harm caused to non-parties. However, a jury may consider evidence of harm to others when assessing the reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct and the appropriate amount of a punitive damages verdict. Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 549 US 346, 356-57, 127 S Ct 1057, 166 L Ed 2d 940 (2007) (Williams II). In this “low-tar” tobacco case, we decide that the trial court correctly refused defendant’s requested instruction that would have informed the jury on the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. DeNucci v. HenningsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Estate of Schwarz Ex Rel. Schwarz v. Philip Morris Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Kennedy v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API