Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Notis
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 12, 1992PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
Defendant Steve Notis appeals from a judgment of foreclosure entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Bro-drick, J.) as a result of plaintiff Maine National Bank's 1 motion for summary judgment. Defendant argues that his affirmative defense alleging the Bank’s violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1691-1691f (1982 & Supp.1991), constituted a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment. We agree, and vacate the judgment.
In 1987 Steve Notis, his wife, Irene, and a third party executed a promissory note in the amount of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennsylvania R. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Marine American State Bank of Bloomington v. LincolnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Inniss v. Methot Buick-Opel, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Midlantic National Bank v. E.F. Hansen, Jr. G. Eileen Hansen Hansen Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bank of the West v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- MacHias Savings Bank v. RamsdellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Maine Family Federal Credit Union v. Sun Life Assurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Riggs Nat. Bank of Washington, DC v. WebsterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.