Legal Opinion

Austin v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 23, 1950No. 54139; protest 130863-K (Tampa)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

A mast, boom, and sail of a sailboat, which sailboat had been previously imported, are claimed by plaintiff to be a short shipment and consequently should be classified for duty as though they were imported as integral parts of the boat.

The previously imported sailboat had been assessed with duty at 15 per centum ad valorem pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 370 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 370), as modified by the trade agreement entered into between the United States and Canada, effective January 1, 1939 (74 Treas. Dec. 235, T. D. 49752).

It should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. University of Chicago v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API