Legal Opinion

Lusk v. Pennzoil United, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided October 13, 1972No. WC 71-24-SPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ORMA R. SMITH, District Judge.

This action has been submitted to the court on briefs without oral argument on the motion of plaintiffs for their severance and for a separate trial. Defendant, Pennzoil United, Inc. (Pennzoil), and third party defendants, Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool), and Aaron Beard (Beard), oppose the motion. The matter is now ripe for decision.

I. THE PLEADINGS

Plaintiffs have filed herein a products liability suit against defendant, Pennzoil. Thereafter, Pennzoil, with the approval of the court, filed a third party complaint impleading Whirlpool and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moss v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Jessie Dale Long MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Weitort v. AH Bull & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Gladden v. Cia De Commercio y Vapores S.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Equal Rights Center v. Equity ResidentialDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  3. Uniroyal, Inc. v. Chambers Gasket & Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Jones v. Vappi & Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Federal Life Insurance Co. v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API