Legal Opinion

Jones v. Vappi & Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 22, 1989No. 88-P-628PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kass J.

Donald Jones and Anthony Tokowicz were hurt when a steel beam on which they were sitting gave way during construction of a film processing plant for the Polaroid *78Corporation. For purposes of the appeal, which involves interpretation of an indemnity clause, the active players are Vappi & Company, Inc. (“Vappi”), the general contractor, and General Iron & Steel Works, Inc. (“General Iron”), a subcontractor to Vappi responsible for fabricating and erecting structural steel and steel decking. Jones and Tokowicz were employees of V & V Erectors, Inc. (“V&V”), to which General Iron had let a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shea v. Bay State Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Goes v. FeldmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. Dominick v. DominickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  5. Kerr v. PalmieriMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Haverhill v. George Brox, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  2. Transamerica Insurance Group v. Turner Construction Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Kelly v. DIMEO, INC. WATERPROOFING CO.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Harnois v. QUANNAPOWITT DEVELOPMENT, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Callahan v. A. J. Welch Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API