Legal Opinion

Hay v. Hay

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WM. E. LEE', J.-

On receipt of the remittitur in the case of Hay v. Hay, ante, p. 159, 232 Pac. 895, in the district court presided over by Judge McNaughton, defendant Hay served on plaintiff a notice that at a time designated therein she would call up for hearing and disposition her motion for counsel fees and suit money. One day prior to the hearing of the motion plaintiff served and filed his motion for a change of venue on the ground of bias and prejudice of the judge. This motion was supported by the affidavit of plaintiff. The motion for a change of venue eame on to be heard by Judge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hay v. HayIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Weiser Irrigation District v. Middle Valley Irrigating Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lessman v. AnschustiguiIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bell v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Gibbert v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Davis v. IrwinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bentley v. Lucky Friday Extension Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API