Legal Opinion

Lessman v. Anschustigui

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1923PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Commissioner.

— Plaintiff, respondent herein, sued defendant, appellant, under the two-mile limit statute. Defendant introduced no evidence, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent for $750.

Appellant makes several assignments of error, which may be properly considered in the following groups: First, overruling appellant’s motion for a change in the place of trial; second, that the trial court erred in allowing the defendant to be called for cross-examination under C. S., sec. 8035, without a proper showing made, and before the plaintiff had made a prima, facie case;…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Boeck v. BoeckIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Sweet v. BallentyneIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Risse v. CollinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Czaplicki v. Gooding Joint School District No. 231Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Boomer v. IsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Evans v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API