Legal Opinion

Davis v. Irwin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1943No. 7084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

This action was commenced in the District Court by the respondents, Davis and wife, to obtain a decree of strict foreclosure on an escrow agreement to sell real estate. The pleadings prior to the amended cross-complaint are not contained in the record ánd are not involved in this case.

March 7, 1942, appellants filed an amended cross-complaint against the respondents and at the same time filed the statutory affidavit required by subd. 4 of sec. 1-1801,1.C.A., as amended by Laws 1933, c. 218, alleging prejudice and bias of the presiding judge, and asking for a change of judges under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lefebvre v. CliffordWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stephens v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Day v. DayIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Bell v. BellIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Circuit CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BitzIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In Re Woodside-Florence Irr. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Lewiston Lime Co. v. BarneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State ex rel. McMahan v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Anderson v. WinsteadIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API