Legal Opinion
Nabhan v. Board of Selectmen of Salisbury
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 17, 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
The plaintiffs are owners of realty and businesses located on The Driftway, a public way in the town of Salisbury. The defendants closed that way to vehicular traffic, and the plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court alleging that the defendants had acted in violation of G. L. c. 85, § 2E, and c. 90, § 18, 3 and that the closing of the way constituted a taking of their property by eminent domain. They sought either to enjoin permanently the closing of The Driftway or to obtain an assessment of damages under the provisions of G. L. c. 79. Their request for preliminary injunctive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bucchiere v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Commissioner of Health & HospitalsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Ashford v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Coady v. StackMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Randall v. RapozaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.